
There’s a guy out in Gun-nut Nation named Chris Bird, who is regarded as one of the patron saints of the concealed-carry movement, and I have just finished reading his book, The Concealed Handgun Manual, which is considered a must-read book by all the noisemakers who believe that we are a safer country because we have access to guns. And since Chris may think that some of the things I’m going to say about his book aren’t all that positive or nice, I’ll give the book a plug because you can buy it right here.
As a matter of fact, I strongly urge my friends in Gun-control Nation to read this book, because if there’s one thing that strikes me about activists who want to see us reduce the violence and injuries caused by guns, it’s the degree to which they seem to have little, if any awareness of what is said or believed by the other side. Ask the average gun-control true-believer to explain the difference between an ‘internet’ sale and a ‘personal, sale of a gun and you’ll get the deer-in-the-headlights look. Then ask the same person to explain the difference between an assault rifle and a semi-auto long gun and you’ll probably get much the same look.
I wouldn’t recommend Bird’s book were it not for the fact that the issue of concealed-carry basically defines the entire gun debate. Why? Because everyone (except me) seems to believe that the 2nd Amendment gives Americans the ‘right’ to own a gun. But where the break occurs between the two sides is explaining why someone should or shouldn’t own a gun. And the gun industry has been selling its products for the last thirty or so years by telling customers that a gun is an essential ‘tool’ for self-defense, even though there is absolutely no valid research which shows this argument to be true.
So what we get down to here is a mind-set in the heads of many Americans who as a group form the market for continued gun sales. And Chris Bird happens to write books which appeal directly to that mind-set, whether there’s any reality behind it or not. If my friends in Gun-control are really serious about coming up with ‘reasonable’ gun restrictions which will appeal to ‘reasonable’ people on the other side, reading Bird’s book might give them some insights into why those gun owners believe they should own guns.
Bird begins the book with a lecture on ‘situational awareness,’ a self-defense concept first developed by Jeff Cooper (whose widow passed away yesterday at the age of 99) back in the 1970’s, which is when, thanks to Glock, the idea of owning and carrying a small, concealable, hi-powered and hi-capacity handgun first took hold. The argument made by Bird is both simple-stupid, namely, that all of us are at all times possible targets of predators who can only be repulsed with personal armed force because the cops never arrive on time.
The book then goes through a whole series of episodes where armed citizens saved themselves from a criminal attack; it then covers how to choose a handgun, how to practice with your gun, and how to ‘win a gunfight’ with references all the way back to the OK Corral. If you’re a bone-fide member of Gun-control Nation and read this book, you’ll quickly decide that it represents nothing more than a marketing scam designed to mislead delusional people into believing they really need to own a gun.
I disagree. I know many of the folks who take seriously what Bird has to say, and their views might run counter to the prevailing liberal orthodoxy on gun violence, but there’s no reason to believe that what they think about armed, self-defense should simply be considered the product of deranged minds. These folks choose to be gun owners with the same degree of diligence that many of my friends believe that gluten-free foods will prevent chronic fatigue syndrome or worse.
Want to reduce gun violence? At least try to understand what the other side thinks.
Jul 31, 2019 @ 11:20:37
I suppose armed self defense in a SHTF context is what competition mass start bicycle or motorcycle racing is to simply tooling around on a motorcycle or bicycle–the ability to use the tool in extreme situations where failure means getting badly hurt. And that is a very rare event, compared to the opportunity for Junior to find the piece when you left it on the reading desk. That’s the bottom line.
I only had to “unzip my coat” once, back in the seventies, when on a hunting trip, and meanwhile I was thinking as fast as I could about how to defuse the situation so that the guy who ran me off the road with his pickup and was hollering at me would just leave me alone. Mind over blued steel worked and to this day, I would have said even more self-effacing things to settle that incident non-violently. I only had a bad bicycle race crash once when I let my concentration slip, and I ended up with a percussion fractured clavicle rather than a strong race finish. Given my penchant for spazzing, I fortunately never decided to race motorcycles.
But those global statistics that Hemenway et al like to parade about having a gun are just that–global stats, and take no consideration of the difference between someone who is dead serious about self defense and someone who buys that Glock and tosses it into a coat pocket after hitting a target at seven yards and getting signed off. To that person, its like the St. Christopher medal my mom gave me when I bought my first motorcycle. Well, maybe that St. Chris medal really has kept me alive all these years…
Jul 31, 2019 @ 12:58:57
AMEN, Mike!!! AMEN!!!
Jul 31, 2019 @ 13:02:24
Khal, you should write a column. You make sense and are fun to read.
Jul 31, 2019 @ 13:52:40
I’ve been thinking about it but lately, the alligators have gotten the better of me as I work on the swamp.