Yesterday, the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals just gave the gun industry a very nice gift. They decided a case which if the opinion stands, will allow persons between 18 and 20 years of age to buy and own handguns. There happen to be about 13 million men and women in that age bracket which means that every, single one of them might now be considered as possible customers for owning a handgun.
If you take the trouble to read the majority opinion written by a judge who was put on the bench by Donnie Trump, you’ll find yourself in the same kind of never-never land thinking that was thrown out of virtually every court that Rudy Giuliani and a couple of other so-called attorneys tried to convince about the 2020 election ‘theft.’ The entire opinion, which basically throws out a provision of the gun-control law passed in 1968 (GCA68), rests on a long-winded historical recitation of pre-Constitutional militia laws, plus a selective reading of data on whether guns in the hands of people under the age of 21 represents a community threat.
Behind this approach is the majority’s concern about gun-control laws which would relegate the 2nd Amendment to a ‘second-class’ status, a phrase first used by Clarence Thomas when the SCOTUS refused to hear another 2nd-Amendment case. The dissenting judge, who was appointed by Obama, responded to this concern with this: “Indeed, in a country that boasts a Congress, bench, bar, academy, and electorate that are all attentive to the prerogatives of gun owners, where many may conceal their weapons,1 carry them openly,2 or “stand their ground,”3 and where civilian gun ownership rates are second to none,4 the majority’s second-class status concern is simply surreal.” [pp. 89-90.]
The dissenting judge also reminded his colleagues that GCA68 does not make it illegal for persons under the age of 21 to own or possess handguns, the law simply prevents federally-licensed gun dealers from selling handguns to anyone who is not yet 21-years-old. The judge then goes on to say, and here’s where the rubber truly meets the road, that “the Second Amendment is exceptional not because it is uniquely oppressed or imperiled, but rather because it is singularly capable of causing harm.” [ p. 90.]
Bingo! That’s what this case is really all about. Forget all this malarky about whether a kid who was in some state militia back in 1764 could walk into the town’s gun shop and buy a handgun to take home. There weren’t any gun shops doing business in 1764.
Forget this nonsense about how all these millions of law-abiding Americans are walking around with guns and keeping themselves and their neighbors safe. There’s about as much truth to that crap as there is to the claim that thousands of phony mail-in ballots mysteriously showed up in Pennsylvania and moved that state’s 20 electoral votes to Joe instead of to – what’s his name?
But sometimes even the most flagrant lies and distortions end up being regarded as true. It turns out, for example, that the self-styled militia groups like the Three Percenters and the Oath Keepers are now realigning themselves to oppose the government’s promotion of getting vaccinated against Covid-19. Want to prove you’re a real American? Spend a week on a ventilator at your local ICU.
In sum, I happen to think this 4th Circuit decision to let gun dealers sell handguns to kids is a good thing. Because maybe, just maybe it will make my friends in Gun-control Nation ask themselves what we really should do to reduce the injuries and deaths caused by the use of guns.
We don’t need to prevent someone who is 19-years-old from buying a semi-automatic pistol which holds 17 rounds of military-grade ammunition and can be reloaded in 5 seconds or less. We need to restrict everyone from buying and walking around with those types of guns.
Want to keep a handgun in your house in case one of those ‘street thugs’ tries to break his way in? I’ll sell you a nice, used, six-shot revolver for $299.95. It will do the job just fine.
Jul 14, 2021 @ 11:01:47
I’d wager that at least as much damage is being done by the 1A than the 2A. We might be shooting people left and right, but the whole country is circling the bowl courtesy of the “free speech” that is rampant on social media and the internet. Whether it be ignoring the pandemic, ignoring climate change, or just ignoring common sense, “defunding the police”, lining the battlements about CRT (which 90% of the people who are making the most noise don’t even understand) and those believing the Big Lie, a lot of lives, not to mention, the future of the Republic, are at risk.
Seems this case will likely go to en banc, right? In the context of that well regulated militia, I think long guns are far more important than a hand cannon. But what do I know?I shot my old man’s hand cannons all through my teens but always under adult supervision. I didn’t own my first handgun, a 22 LR Ruger Mk 1, until I was 22. That was a fun pistol to shoot. Cheap, too. Ammo was really cheap and IIRC, the gun cost me about a hundred bucks (1976 dollars).
Jul 14, 2021 @ 13:00:37
“We don’t need to prevent someone who is 19-years-old from buying a semi-automatic pistol which holds 17 rounds of military-grade ammunition and can be reloaded in 5 seconds or less.”
Trust me, I can reload in way less than five seconds.
“We need to restrict everyone from buying and walking around with those types of guns.”
Yeah that’s the typical Euro-style antigun attitude. I will walk around with whatever type of gun I can. And no so called “gun guy” will get in my way. Because this is America, not Europe. We have RIGHTS (not ‘rights’) here.
“I’ll sell you a nice, used, six-shot revolver for $299.95. It will do the job just fine.”
No sale. I wouldn’t give one penny to an antigunner like you. Why would I want 6 shots when I can have 17?
Jul 14, 2021 @ 13:17:58
There may not have been any gun shops doing business in 1764, but I do know that guns and America were born around the same time and they grew up together.
So, when the wild, wooly and unwieldy Arquebus was brought to the New World it ignited a long and complex future of expansion and protection of this country.
To protect and help unite – divide – this most promising nation the very first gun control law ever enacted on these shores was passed in Virginia in 1640. It provided that black – even freemen – could not own guns.
The original purpose of gun control: To protect the Klansmen from their victims. So, yes there may not have been any guns shops doing business in 1764 but people were getting those “assault weapons” from somewhere. Even then there were select groups that felt superior. (Maybe even some “gun guys”)
When you restrict everyone from buying and walking around with those types of guns the principal purpose for doing so over the centuries has been to preserve the power of the ruling elites.
P.S. Don’t forget there will be an additional $100 fee for your Massachusetts FID card to go along with the $299.96 purchase price of Mike’s six-shot revolver.