Now that Joe Biden has put the force of his office behind enacting another assault-rifle ban, the good guys who shill for the gun industry have to respond. Which, among other things, has resulted in the publication of a book, America’s Rifle – The Case for the AR-15, written by Stephen Halbrook who has filed endless pro-gun legal briefs and made many pro-gun appearances in courts over the years.
Halbrook seems to believe that we shouldn’t devote any special, regulatory controls over the AR-15 because it has become America’s most popular gun, currently owned by more than millions of law-abiding Americans who shoot the gun for sport and fun. There are also more than 30 million among us who enjoy tobacco, so Holbrook probably thinks there’s no reason to restrict the sale of cigarettes.
The book is a compilation of many courts cases relevant to whether or not we should ban the AR-15 which, on balance, appear to justify Halbrook’s argument that the term ‘assault rifle’ is simply an effort by the anti-gun crowd to chip away at 2nd-Amendment ‘rights,’ as well as to deprive freedom-loving Americans of what has become the country’s most popular ‘tool’ that is used to defend themselves.
All well and good, except that Halbrook omits any discussion about important litigation which completely undermines his pro-gun case, as well as the fact that in discussing the history, design and use of assault rifles, Halbrook demonstrates the fact that he doesn’t know anything about guns.
How do you write an entire book about litigation related to the AR-15 and not mention the 2013 law passed in the Chicago suburb of Highland Park which didn’t just prohibit town residents from purchasing the gun, but said that any current AR-15 owner could only keep his gun by moving out of town. This law, by the way, was upheld all the way to the Supreme Court based on one, very simple legal expedient, namely, that the Highland Park cops believed the gun was too dangerous to be used by anyone in that community for any reason at all.
The idea that the AR-15 was too dangerous for civilian ownership was also behind another legal case which Halbrook completely omits from his book, which was the suit against the gun maker brought by the parents of children killed at the Sandy Hook Elementary School, which resulted in Remington Arms agreeing to lay out $73 million in compensation for the murder and mayhem committed with the use of one of their guns.
If Holbrook had spent a chapter discussing these cases from a pro-gun point of view, he might have actually produced a book which would have been an important contribution to the current AR-15 ban debate. However, by failing to mention this litigation, the author has simply produced yet another biased and erroneous piece of work which informs the public about nothing at all.
But the absence of any mention of Highland Park and Sandy Hook aren’t the biggest gaps in this book. What really demonstrates the limits of Halbrook’s alleged expertise is how he describes the design of the AR-15 and in the process, gets the whole thing completely wrong.
The distinctiveness of the AR-15 does not lie, as Holbrook seems to believe, in the gun’s hand grip, but rather in a design feature which is never mentioned at all. And this feature happens to be the fact that the gun’s magazine is inserted from below rather than above the frame.
Not only does this design allow for a magazine which can hold up to or more than fifty rounds, but an empty magazine can be switched out for another full magazine in two seconds or less. The Sandy Hook massacre was accomplished with an AR-15 and several additional, 20-shot mags and it took the shooter less than three minutes to kill 4 adults and 20 kids. Any rifle which can deliver military-grade firepower that quickly has no business being described as a ‘sporting’ gun.
I bought my first assault rifle, a Colt Sporter, in 1977 or 1978. Over the years I have owned maybe another half-dozen assault-rifle guns and probably sold a hundred or so in my various gun shops.
It never occurred to me that I was owning or selling a gun that would be carried into a school or a supermarket and used to mow down a bunch of adults and kids.
But if I wanted to kill a bunch of people at the same time, I wouldn’t think twice about using an AR-15.
Which is why the gun is too dangerous to be sold and why Stephen Halbrook’s attempt to lionize this weapon as ‘America’s rifle’ is, to quote Grandpa, nothing more than ‘hai cock,’ (read: nonsense or bullshit – take your pick.)
.
Mar 19, 2023 @ 11:33:21
Today:
“I bought my first assault rifle, a Colt Sporter, in 1977 or 1978. Over the years I have owned maybe another half-dozen assault-rifle guns and probably sold a hundred or so in my various gun shops.”
A couple years ago:
“I’m a real-life gun guy. I own a gun shop and I have sold more than 15,000 guns, including at least 1,000 assault rifles.” by Mike Weisser
Follow the money.
Mar 19, 2023 @ 13:36:27
Right on Brother! The AR 15 can now be replaced by the new Sig. assault rifle which was made for the military, but you can buy it for home use for only $ 8,000 bucks! Bambi and Peter Rabbit beware.
Mar 19, 2023 @ 13:42:20
P.S. As I’ve read the American Rifle and have found numerous mentions of the Highland Park ordinance.
Mar 19, 2023 @ 13:52:39
America’s Rifle not American Rifle
Sorry, words mean things and so do numbers.
Mar 20, 2023 @ 03:50:02
“the Highland Park cops believed the gun was too dangerous to be used by anyone in that community for any reason at all.”
…How much you wanna bet that the Highland Park P.D. made sure there was an exemption for their officers?
…And if the AR is so “dangerous”, why would the Police need them?
Mar 20, 2023 @ 12:18:45
“I bought my first assault rifle, a Colt Sporter, in 1977 or 1978. Over the years I have owned maybe another half-dozen assault-rifle guns…”
I Wonder what Mike’s had MORE of:
“Assault-rifle guns”…Or Negligent Discharges?
Mar 21, 2023 @ 08:20:23
Safe for me but not for thee!
California has a handgun drop test to insure there are no ‘unsafe’ guns available for public sale. If a gun does not pass the test (or the maker does not submit guns and shakedown money for testing-not to mention an annual fee to maintain its status as ‘safe’), it cannot be purchased by consumers. Guns purchased by Police Departments are exempt from this as are personal guns purchased by police officers.
The crowning ‘turd’ in this Gun Safety legislation is that Single Action revolvers are exempt.
The most famous and prolific single action of all time (Colt 1873 SAA) is a gun that California allows for sale to the public that is so unsafe most every owner/user carries it with only five cartridges and the hammer resting against the empty chamber. Knock the hammer on a loaded chamber and ‘boom’.
Don’t get me wrong (where have we heard that before?), but anytime somebody starts soapboxing about Gun Safety, remember, it’s ‘for the children’ or some other bullshit.